Insights Association Permanently Bans Four Individuals Who Pled Guilty in Op4G/SliceMR Market Research Fraud Case - Articles

Articles

Stay at the forefront of the consumer insights and analytics industry with our Thought Leadership content. Here you’ll find timely updates on the Insights Association’s advocacy efforts, including the latest legislative and regulatory developments that impact how we work. In addition, this section offers expert perspectives on innovative research techniques and methodologies, as well as valuable analysis of evolving consumer trends. Together, these insights provide a trusted resource for professionals looking to navigate change, elevate their practice, and shape the future of our industry.

Insights Association Permanently Bans Four Individuals Who Pled Guilty in Op4G/SliceMR Market Research Fraud Case

The Insights Association (IA), the nonprofit association representing the U.S. market research, insights, and analytics industry, has permanently barred Frank Nappo, Frank Hayden, Daniel Harriman, and Ryan Stoudt from IA membership after each pled guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in the federal case involving Op4G, Slice (SliceMR), and SNWare. The IA Standards Committee will apply similar consequences to any other individuals or companies involved in fraudulent activity.

In April 2025, after the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Hampshire announced indictments in the case, IA suspended the memberships of SliceMR and the individuals named in the indictment. At the time, IA said that out of respect for the presumption of innocence, it would make final decisions on permanent bans only after a final judgment, plea, or other ruling. Those pleas have now come in.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Hayden pled guilty on February 2, 2026; Harriman on February 24, 2026; Stoudt on March 5, 2026; and Nappo (who was Op4G's CEO) on August 31, 2026. Prosecutors said that, “In 2014… conspirators decided to increase company revenues by generating fabricated survey data. To execute the scheme, the conspirators recruited ‘ants,’ who pretended to be legitimate survey takers but instead were paid a nominal fee for completing surveys that produced false market research data. Some of the conspirators even served as ‘ants’ and fraudulently took large quantities of surveys themselves, receiving significant payments. To evade detection, the conspirators exchanged instructions with each other and the ‘ants.’ These instructions included directions on how to answer survey screener questions, provided parameters on how long ‘ants’ should remain on surveys, and encouraged the use of virtual private network (VPN) services to conceal real IP addresses.”

Three more co-defendants remain international fugitives.

"Our clients, our research subjects, and the public depend on one thing above all else from this industry: that the insights we provide are real," said Anita Watkins, CEO of the Insights Association. "Fraud like this is a betrayal of that trust, and it demands a clear and lasting response. We will continue to insist on transparency and honesty at every step of the research process, from how participants are sourced to how data is delivered. The thousands of ethical organizations and professionals in our industry have earned their reputation, and we will not let it be defined by the actions of a few criminals."

IA encourages buyers and providers to: engage with the work of the Council of Data Integrity; use the data quality resources available through the Global Data Quality initiative, including the Data Quality Excellence Pledge; and pursue ISO 20252 certification (the global market research standard) through CIRQ.

Complaints against a member for alleged violations of the IA Code of Standards and Ethics may be filed at enforcement@insightsassociation.org .

Related

Share

Login

Members only Article - Please login to view
  • Back to top