The DoC will monitor any false claims of EU-U.S. DPF participation or the improper use of the EU-U.S. DPF certification mark. In particular, the DoC will on an ongoing basis verify that organisations that
(i) withdraw from participation in the EU-U.S. DPF,
(ii) fail to complete the annual re-certification (i.e. either started, but failed to complete the annual re-certification process in a timely manner or did not even start the annual re-certification process),
(iii) are removed as a participant, notably for “persistent failure to comply,” or
(iv) fail to complete an initial certification (i.e. started, but failed to complete the initial certification process in a timely manner), remove from any relevant published privacy policy references to the EU-U.S. DPF that imply that the organisation actively participates in the Framework.
The DoC will also conduct internet searches to identify references to the EU-U.S. DPF in organisations’ privacy policies, including to identify false claims by organisations that never participated in the EU-U.S. DPF. Where the DoC finds that references to the EU-U.S. DPF have not been removed or are improperly used, it will inform the organisation about a possible referral to the FTC/DoT. If an organisation fails to respond satisfactorily, the DoC will refer the matter to the relevant agency for potential enforcement action or other relevant U.S. enforcement authorities.
Beyond those annual fees, the only additional fees would arise if you receive a complaint that persists to the arbitration stage.