Articles

03Mar

MRA Volunteer Testifies in Defense of Exit Polling at Committee Hearing

A volunteer leader of the Marketing Research Association (MRA) testified this morning at a Minnesota committee hearing in defense of exit polling. Gayle Belkengren, President of the MRA Minnesota/Upper Midwest Chapter, spoke in the Minnesota State House in support of legalizing exit pollsters’ access to voting places.

The Minnesota House Committee on State and Local Government Operations Reform, Technology and Elections convened a hearing on H.F. 3108 today – companion legislation to S.F. 2388, which MRA endorsed last month.

Belkengren, testifying on behalf of MRA, commented, “Access to voters is essential to make this research work. The greater the distance between a researcher and the voting place, the more likely that voters will leave without ever having an opportunity to share their opinions.”

Current Minnesota law doesn’t allow anyone near a voting place “except an election official or an individual who is waiting to register or to vote”.  H.F. 3108 would add to that exception, “or an individual who is conducting exit polling” and define exit polling as “approaching voters in a predetermined pattern as they leave the polling place after they have voted and asking voters to fill out an anonymous, written questionnaire.”

Exit polling, in addition to helping to create compelling election night coverage, gathers important information, from people who actually voted, about their demographics, intentions, and attitudes toward candidates and issues.

Gayle Belkengren is a volunteer with the MRA State Capital Network and has been President of the MRA Minnesota/Upper Midwest Chapter since May of 2009.  She has been in the marketing research business for 35 years starting at CJ Olson and Cook Research as a VP, and was most recently a senior account executive at Questar. Gayle specializes in business development and consultative selling.

MRA will be offering any assistance possible to pass H.F. 3108 and S.F. 2388.

About the Author

Howard Fienberg

Howard Fienberg

Based in Washington, DC, Howard is the Insights Association's lobbyist for the marketing research and data analytics industry, focusing primarily on consumer privacy and data security, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), tort reform, and the funding and integrity of the decennial Census and the American Community Survey (ACS). Howard has more than two decades of public policy experience. Before the Insights Association, he worked in Congress as senior legislative staffer for then-Representatives Christopher Cox (CA-48) and Cliff Stearns (FL-06). He also served more than four years with a science policy think tank, working to improve the understanding of scientific and social research and methodology among journalists and policymakers. Howard is also co-director of The Census Project, a 900+ member coalition in support of a fair and accurate Census and ACS. He has also served previously on the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Lobbying and Ethics and and the Association of Government Relations Professionals. Howard has an MA International Relations from the University of Essex in England and a BA Honors Political Studies from Trent University in Canada, and has obtained the Certified Association Executive (CAE), Professional Lobbying Certificate (PLC) and the Public Policy Certificate (PPC). When not running advocacy for the Insights Association, Howard enjoys hockey, NFL football, sci-fi and horror movies, playing with his dog, and spending time with family and friends.

Related

Fighting for You: April 2022 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Fighting for You: April 2022 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Since our last Fighting for You, the Insights Association has been charging full-steam into debates ...

Read More >
Nebraska L.B. 843 Would No Longer Restrict Exit Polling Near Ballot Drop-Boxes

Nebraska L.B. 843 Would No Longer Restrict Exit Polling Near Ballot Drop-Boxes

Nebraska L.B. 843, which would have restricted exit polling or opinion polling of users of a “secur...

Read More >
Minnesota S.F. 34 Would Raise Penalties for Automated Call Violations

Minnesota S.F. 34 Would Raise Penalties for Automated Call Violations

Minnesota S.F. 34 would layer on extra civil penalties for automated calls.

Read More >
Minnesota Restrictions on Pharmaceutical Marketing Research with Medical Practitioners

Minnesota Restrictions on Pharmaceutical Marketing Research with Medical Practitioners

Each time the state of Minnesota has tried to clarify treatment of respondent incentives for the par...

Read More >

Time of Day Calling Restrictions

The federal and state time of day laws/regulations restrict when certain callers may contact members...

Read More >
State Data Security Breach Notification Laws

State Data Security Breach Notification Laws

A state-by-state guide to data security breach notification requirements

Read More >
Members only Article - Please login to view