MRA Helps Kill Legislation in Maryland, Mississippi and Rhode Island – Would Have Crippled Research with Health Care Practitioners - Articles

Articles

22Mar

MRA Helps Kill Legislation in Maryland, Mississippi and Rhode Island – Would Have Crippled Research with Health Care Practitioners

(Glastonbury, Conn.): MRA scored several recent victories in the ongoing fight against legislation to require public reporting of survey research incentives for health care practitioners or that ban them outright. MRA recently helped to convince legislators in Maryland and Rhode Island to withdraw their bills and helped to defeat legislation in Mississippi.

LaToya Lang, MRA’s State Legislative Director, commented that, “with more and more states attempting to restrict or publicly disclose research incentives for health care practitioners, MRA values every win we can get.”

After communication with MRA, the sponsors in Maryland of H. 1477 and S. 196 agreed to withdraw their legislation. S. 196 would have required public reporting of payments made to health care practitioners by pharmaceutical manufacturers and explicitly included survey research incentives. H. 1477 would have required public reporting of aggregate spending on pharmaceutical marketing, including payments to physicians for participation in survey research.

MRA advocacy in Mississippi helped convince legislators in the State House to defeat H.B. 811 in the Public Health and Human Services Committee and the Judiciary Committee. H.B. 811 was one of the most expansive bills MRA has seen, requiring public reporting for research incentives to any physician, nurse practitioner or their immediate family members that originated from pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Rhode Island’s H. 5645 and S. 707 would have banned gifts to health care practitioners from pharmaceutical companies, including survey research incentives of any dollar amount. Communication from MRA helped convince the bills’ sponsors to reconsider their approach and withdraw the legislation.

The successes in Maryland, Mississippi and Rhode Island follow MRA’s defeat of MRA’s defeat of S.B. 99 in New Mexico earlier this month.

Research incentives to doctors have been (often inadvertently) caught up in ongoing attempts at the state level to restrict “gifts” to physicians from pharmaceutical, medical device, and medical supply manufacturers. Such “gifts” are assumed to be buying influence on behalf of the manufacturers.

About the Author

Howard Fienberg

Howard Fienberg

Based in Washington, DC, Howard is the Insights Association's lobbyist for the marketing research and data analytics industry, focusing primarily on consumer privacy and data security, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), tort reform, and the funding and integrity of the decennial Census and the American Community Survey (ACS). Howard has more than two decades of public policy experience. Before the Insights Association, he worked in Congress as senior legislative staffer for then-Representatives Christopher Cox (CA-48) and Cliff Stearns (FL-06). He also served more than four years with a science policy think tank, working to improve the understanding of scientific and social research and methodology among journalists and policymakers. Howard is also co-director of The Census Project, a 900+ member coalition in support of a fair and accurate Census and ACS. He has also served previously on the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Lobbying and Ethics and and the Association of Government Relations Professionals. Howard has an MA International Relations from the University of Essex in England and a BA Honors Political Studies from Trent University in Canada, and has obtained the Certified Association Executive (CAE), Professional Lobbying Certificate (PLC) and the Public Policy Certificate (PPC). When not running advocacy for the Insights Association, Howard enjoys hockey, NFL football, sci-fi and horror movies, playing with his dog, and spending time with family and friends.

Related

Fighting for You: March 2024 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Fighting for You: March 2024 Legislative and Regulatory Update

The insights industry’s public policy concerns entered March roaring like a lion, but they are not ...

Read More >
Maryland H.B. 1255 and S.B. 957 Would Restrict AI Use in Employment Screening

Maryland H.B. 1255 and S.B. 957 Would Restrict AI Use in Employment Screening

Maryland H.B. 1255 and S.B. 957 would restrict “algorithmic decision systems” in connection with s...

Read More >
Maryland H.B. 1515 Would Tax Insights Services

Maryland H.B. 1515 Would Tax Insights Services

Maryland H.B. 1515 would impose sales and use taxes on most services, including insights services.

Read More >
Issues of Interest to Insights Industry Surface in President Biden’s 2024 State of the Union Address

Issues of Interest to Insights Industry Surface in President Biden’s 2024 State of the Union Address

President Joe Biden’s recent State of the Union Address to Congress touched on a few policy areas o...

Read More >
Washington H.B. 1951 Could Restrict AI Use in Dealing with Research Subjects

Washington H.B. 1951 Could Restrict AI Use in Dealing with Research Subjects

Washington H.B. 1951 would regulate artificial intelligence (AI) used in decision-making, including ...

Read More >
Fighting for You: December 2023 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Fighting for You: December 2023 Legislative and Regulatory Update

As the insights industry closes out 2023 on the calendar, the Insights Association looked back at ou...

Read More >
Members only Article - Please login to view