Marketing Research Association Victory in Massachusetts - Articles

Articles

28May

Marketing Research Association Victory in Massachusetts

(Glastonbury, Conn.) Today, the Marketing Research Association (MRA) announces victory in its lobbying and grassroots actions to protect research with health care practitioners in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Department of Health has issued official guidance exempting market research incentives from the application of the state’s new Marketing Code of Conduct for pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers.

The Department specifically exempted incentives from public reporting requirements, as long as health care practitioners who receive market research incentives “do not know what pharmaceutical or medical device manufacturing company” sponsored the research and the sponsor “does not know which health care practitioners participated in the study”.

MRA organized researchers on the ground in Massachusetts to help convince the state government to exempt market research. The research profession faced a short timeframe before the regulations came into effect, threatening a key part of the research business.

Terri-Lynn Hawley, an MRA volunteer and Vice President at Schlesinger Associates in Boston, raved about the victory and her experience as a citizen activist. “I really enjoyed working on this. It is something that I was very passionate about and it is nice to see that one really can make a difference.”

In addition to Terri, MRA thanked Aurora Choi of Focus Pointe Global, Lloyd Simon of Cambridge Focus, Frank Amelia of Copley Focus Centers, Larry Jenkins of Focus On Boston, Brenda Chartoff of National Field and Focus, Maria Kuschel of Fieldwork Boston, and Jason Miller of Performance Plus for their efforts, as well as other members of the profession that responded to MRA’s grassroots action webpage.

MRA still faces the threat of legislation in numerous states and in the U.S. Congress that could require public reporting of incentives or ban them outright.

On March 11, 2009 the Massachusetts Public Health Council released new regulations (the Marketing Code of Conduct) for interactions with health care practitioners. By requiring the public reporting of payments to practitioners that originated from pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, the Code would have made practitioners less likely to participate in vital survey research that provides enormous benefit to the public. Reduced participation would have led to less research performed in Massachusetts, resulting in significant loss of jobs and income – something that Massachusetts could ill afford in this time of economic hardship.

Research incentives to health care practitioners are more frequently being caught up in attempts at the state level to restrict “gifts” to practitioners from pharmaceutical, medical device, and medical supply manufacturers. Such “gifts” are assumed to be buying influence on behalf of the manufacturers.

About the Author

Howard Fienberg

Howard Fienberg

Based in Washington, DC, Howard is the Insights Association's lobbyist for the marketing research and data analytics industry, focusing primarily on consumer privacy and data security, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), tort reform, and the funding and integrity of the decennial Census and the American Community Survey (ACS). Howard has more than two decades of public policy experience. Before the Insights Association, he worked in Congress as senior legislative staffer for then-Representatives Christopher Cox (CA-48) and Cliff Stearns (FL-06). He also served more than four years with a science policy think tank, working to improve the understanding of scientific and social research and methodology among journalists and policymakers. Howard is also co-director of The Census Project, a 900+ member coalition in support of a fair and accurate Census and ACS. He has also served previously on the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Lobbying and Ethics and and the Association of Government Relations Professionals. Howard has an MA International Relations from the University of Essex in England and a BA Honors Political Studies from Trent University in Canada, and has obtained the Certified Association Executive (CAE), Professional Lobbying Certificate (PLC) and the Public Policy Certificate (PPC). When not running advocacy for the Insights Association, Howard enjoys hockey, NFL football, sci-fi and horror movies, playing with his dog, and spending time with family and friends.

Related

Fighting for You: February 2024 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Fighting for You: February 2024 Legislative and Regulatory Update

This month, the Insights Association focused on extensive artificial intelligence legislation at the...

Read More >
Washington H.B. 1951 Could Restrict AI Use in Dealing with Research Subjects

Washington H.B. 1951 Could Restrict AI Use in Dealing with Research Subjects

Washington H.B. 1951 would regulate artificial intelligence (AI) used in decision-making, including ...

Read More >
Massachusetts Legislation Restricting Calls to Cell Phones - H. 291

Massachusetts Legislation Restricting Calls to Cell Phones - H. 291

Massachusetts H. 291 would prohibit many “robocalls” to Massachusetts cell phones, most of which a...

Read More >
Fighting for You: December 2023 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Fighting for You: December 2023 Legislative and Regulatory Update

As the insights industry closes out 2023 on the calendar, the Insights Association looked back at ou...

Read More >
State Privacy Bill Roundup 2023

State Privacy Bill Roundup 2023

The insights industry faced comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation in 2023 in dozens of sta...

Read More >
2023 Tax Legislation Update for the Insights Industry

2023 Tax Legislation Update for the Insights Industry

The U.S. insights industry was able to avoid new tax laws specifically aimed at our industry in 2023...

Read More >
Members only Article - Please login to view