CMOR Kills Bad Legislation Regulating Polling in Louisiana - Articles

Articles

03Mar

CMOR Kills Bad Legislation Regulating Polling in Louisiana

(Washington, D.C.)—CMOR in late February helped defeat Louisiana House Bill 58—legislation that would have severely harmed political survey and opinion research with residents of Louisiana.

HB 58, which would have required disclosure of a poll’s sponsor at the beginning of a call, passed the State House February 18. It came up for consideration in the State Senate on Feb. 28. A joint effort by CMOR staff and a new CMOR grassroots volunteer helped to defeat the bill that day.

The bill’s sponsor eventually passed legislation regulating only election communications—sparing survey and opinion research any noticeable impact.

Jude Olinger, CEO of the Olinger Group and a CMOR grassroots volunteer, played a key role in helping CMOR to defeat the legislation. Mr. Olinger drove to the State House in Baton Rouge, and there—using information and analysis provided by CMOR’s government affairs staff—personally appealed to legislators on behalf of the research profession.

“From the wording of questions to the accent of the interviewers, researchers strive mightily to eliminate bias from all aspects of the research process,” said LaToya Lang, CMOR’s State Legislative Director. “With the help of concerned and motivated profession leaders like Jude, CMOR continues to advance the survey and opinion research profession and protect it from threats like Louisiana House Bill 58.”

Mr. Olinger also turned Representative Neil Abramson (Democrat, District 78) into an active advocate for the profession. Rep. Abramson will be working with him and CMOR staff to introduce legislation to protect the use of automated political polls (those using Interactive Voice Response and similar systems) and to restrict persuasion calls (also known as “push polls”) during Louisiana’s regular session starting March 31.

How HB 58 Threatened the Research Profession

LA H.B. 58 would have required stating at the beginning of any telephone poll regarding a political candidate or proposition:

(1) Whether or not it was paid for by a candidate or political committee (or such entity’s agent); and

(2) The name and contact info of the sponsor or candidate/committee.

It would also have required reports within 24 hours to a supervisory committee regarding payments or expenditures for such polls.

Disclosure of who paid for or commissioned a poll and their relationship to a political candidate or ballot initiative (especially at the beginning of a research call) can completely distort or bias the answers respondents provide to research questions.

In most instances, the interviewer administering the questions is unaware who sponsored the poll, or why. The bias that would result from such disclosure would make it extremely difficult to produce scientifically and statistically valid data—an essential tool in political campaigns.

About the CMOR State Capitol Network

Grassroots volunteers work with CMOR to protect and promote the survey and opinion research profession. They help to monitor and respond to legislation that impacts the profession and to foster positive relationships with policymakers and their staffs.

Researchers participate as grassroots volunteers to get involved in policy and politics, to protect their business and research and to stay informed. This way, members of the research profession make their voices heard on issues that impact their businesses while networking with their peers who share similar concerns.

About the Author

Howard Fienberg

Howard Fienberg

Based in Washington, DC, Howard is the Insights Association's lobbyist for the marketing research and data analytics industry, focusing primarily on consumer privacy and data security, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), tort reform, and the funding and integrity of the decennial Census and the American Community Survey (ACS). Howard has more than two decades of public policy experience. Before the Insights Association, he worked in Congress as senior legislative staffer for then-Representatives Christopher Cox (CA-48) and Cliff Stearns (FL-06). He also served more than four years with a science policy think tank, working to improve the understanding of scientific and social research and methodology among journalists and policymakers. Howard is also co-director of The Census Project, a 900+ member coalition in support of a fair and accurate Census and ACS. He has also served previously on the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Lobbying and Ethics and and the Association of Government Relations Professionals. Howard has an MA International Relations from the University of Essex in England and a BA Honors Political Studies from Trent University in Canada, and has obtained the Certified Association Executive (CAE), Professional Lobbying Certificate (PLC) and the Public Policy Certificate (PPC). When not running advocacy for the Insights Association, Howard enjoys hockey, NFL football, sci-fi and horror movies, playing with his dog, and spending time with family and friends.

Related

Minnesota H.F. 4772 and S.F. 4729 - Exit Polling and Opinion Research Under Election Law

Minnesota H.F. 4772 and S.F. 4729 - Exit Polling and Opinion Research Under Election Law

Minnesota H.F. 4772 and S.F. 4729 would expand requirements and restrictions on exit polling at Minn...

Read More >
Fighting for You September 2023 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Fighting for You September 2023 Legislative and Regulatory Update

While temperatures are starting to dip, concerns still simmered in September for the insights indust...

Read More >
New Louisiana Minors Online Privacy Law - S.B. 162

New Louisiana Minors Online Privacy Law - S.B. 162

The governor signed the Secure Online Child Interaction and Age Limitation Act (S.B. 162) into law a...

Read More >
Fighting for You: May 2023 Legislative & Regulatory Update

Fighting for You: May 2023 Legislative & Regulatory Update

As temperatures rose, so did the threats and opportunities for the insights industry in advocacy dur...

Read More >
Louisiana Secure Online Child Interaction and Age Limitation Act - S.B. 162

Louisiana Secure Online Child Interaction and Age Limitation Act - S.B. 162

The Louisiana Secure Online Child Interaction and Age Limitation Act (S.B. 162) would restrict acces...

Read More >
State Privacy Bill Roundup at End of 2022

State Privacy Bill Roundup at End of 2022

The insights industry stared down a variety of state comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation...

Read More >
Members only Article - Please login to view